<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Action Series 5:  Management By LRH Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.savescientology.com/2011/11/action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.savescientology.com/2011/11/action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics</link>
	<description>LRH Intent for the Governance of Scientology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 07:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleksey</title>
		<link>http://blog.savescientology.com/2011/11/action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleksey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.savescientology.com/?p=1210#comment-289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, probably, won&#039;t be in a good standing soon. I found descrepansies with LRH Pls and got no explanations for them. In one mission where I got services I was told (upon my request to clarify is black PR or blackmail or so is an overt) that &quot;it is not an overt that would be taken up in a session&quot;, &quot;this type of situation might be sutable for Ethics write-ups but not for session...&quot;  Do you see how creazy it is? SO even if you did black PR against Scn-gy that is not an over any more!

I also pointed to a verbal tech. There are a lot of promo that carry some LRH&#039;s cites and HAVE NO references to actual HCOBs or HCO PLs to check the out! I also tried to find out policy IAS operates on... that are from LRH and found none. I&#039;ve pointed to people that IAS has nothing to do with Orgs and their products AT ALL. But was told for all that that &quot;this is your openion...&quot; You see, people are so eager to not-is facts and make them look like &quot;somebody&#039;s openion&quot;.

That&#039;s crazy, and I left CoS. All the years (about 13) I was PTS and no advance on the Bridge at all. Now, when I made my decision, I am preparing to audit my family, friends. And if I will audit payed PCs I will price in accordance with LRH&#039;s policy on it and that really makes it affordable for people.

Thank you for your site! I am surprised how long I was PTS and did not see what is going on.

By the way I am also CL 4, before GAT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, probably, won&#8217;t be in a good standing soon. I found descrepansies with LRH Pls and got no explanations for them. In one mission where I got services I was told (upon my request to clarify is black PR or blackmail or so is an overt) that &#8220;it is not an overt that would be taken up in a session&#8221;, &#8220;this type of situation might be sutable for Ethics write-ups but not for session&#8230;&#8221;  Do you see how creazy it is? SO even if you did black PR against Scn-gy that is not an over any more!</p>
<p>I also pointed to a verbal tech. There are a lot of promo that carry some LRH&#8217;s cites and HAVE NO references to actual HCOBs or HCO PLs to check the out! I also tried to find out policy IAS operates on&#8230; that are from LRH and found none. I&#8217;ve pointed to people that IAS has nothing to do with Orgs and their products AT ALL. But was told for all that that &#8220;this is your openion&#8230;&#8221; You see, people are so eager to not-is facts and make them look like &#8220;somebody&#8217;s openion&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s crazy, and I left CoS. All the years (about 13) I was PTS and no advance on the Bridge at all. Now, when I made my decision, I am preparing to audit my family, friends. And if I will audit payed PCs I will price in accordance with LRH&#8217;s policy on it and that really makes it affordable for people.</p>
<p>Thank you for your site! I am surprised how long I was PTS and did not see what is going on.</p>
<p>By the way I am also CL 4, before GAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class IV Auditor</title>
		<link>http://blog.savescientology.com/2011/11/action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Class IV Auditor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.savescientology.com/?p=1210#comment-281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome!  I really appreciate that you have figured out a way for Scientologists that are still in &quot;good standing&quot; to be able to do something about the current situation without having to defect to a splinter group.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!  I really appreciate that you have figured out a way for Scientologists that are still in &#8220;good standing&#8221; to be able to do something about the current situation without having to defect to a splinter group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LRH Communicator</title>
		<link>http://blog.savescientology.com/2011/11/action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>LRH Communicator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.savescientology.com/?p=1210#comment-260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I support this project.
Good luck on your work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support this project.<br />
Good luck on your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Dorion</title>
		<link>http://blog.savescientology.com/2011/11/action-series-5-management-by-lrh-statistics/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Dorion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.savescientology.com/?p=1210#comment-256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
